- Apply for Authority
- P-ISSN1598-1487
- E-ISSN2671-7247
Archival Description and Access in Digital Age that Focuses on the Practices of The National Archives’
- Downloaded
- Viewed
Abstract
Because of the creation and transfer of born-digital records, file unit-based record description practices have changed fundamentally. In this study, we analyzed the archival description practices of The National Archives (TNA) to maintain intellectual control in the digital records management environment and to support the access to records of users. TNA has created an archival description based on ISAD(G) but, for describing born-digital records, it changed the guideline for descriptive cataloging practices. As the method of ISAD(G) cannot adhere to born-digital records, the next-generation descriptive standard, Records in Contexts (RiC), is still being developed by ICA. In addition to international efforts, we need to build an archival description system that fits our environment, especially because since the year 2000, TNA's online cataloging system has changed and ISAD(G) has been modified in this process. This study also proposed continuous monitoring of digital archival descriptions, provides an integrated approach to analog records and digital content and strengthens experimentation and cooperation toward an uncertain digital future.
- keywords
- 기록물 기술, 디지털 기록물 목록, 영국 국립기록관, 국제표준기록기술, 레코드 인 콘텍스트, archival description, digital archival catalogues, The National Archives (TNA), ISAD(G), Records in Contexts (RiC-CM)
Reference
국가기록원. NAK/S 14:2011(v2.0) 영구기록물 기술지침.
김태수. (2008). 목록의 이해:한국도서관협회.
박지영. (2016). 차세대 기록물 기술표준에 관한 연구 - ICA EGAD의 Record In Context를 중심으로 -. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(1), 223-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.223.
박지영. (2017). ISAD(G)에서 RiC-CM으로의 전환에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 17(1), 93-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.093.
박지영. (2017). RiC에 대한 기록공동체의 리뷰를 통해 본 기록물 기술표준 개선을 위한 제안. 기록학연구, (54), 81-109.
윤은하. (2011). 북미 기록학의 동향과 전망 - 패러다임 변화를 중심으로 -. 한국기록관리학회지, 11(2), 77-94.
(2017). “Artefactual responds to draft ICA standard (Records in Context)”(email message from AtoM Program Manager Dan Gillean on the behalf of Artefactual staff to ICA EGAD). https://goo.gl/vF8pZH.
Associazione Nazionale Archivistica Italiana (Sezione Toscana). Record In Contexts: A Conceptual Model For Archival Description: Il contributo italiano.
Carroll, L.. (2011). A Comprehensive Approach to Born-Digital Archives. Archivaria, 72, 61-92.
Clavaud, F.. (2015). ICA Expert Group on Archival Description: Interim Report on the Development of a Conceptual Model (-). Cleveland: SAA Annual Meeting.
Cutter, C. A.. Rules for a Printed Dictionary Catalogue.
Duranti, L.. Comments on “Records in Context.”.
Gueguen, G.. (2013). Toward an International Conceptual Model for Archival Description:A Preliminary Report from the International Council on Archives’ Experts Group on Archival Description. The American Archivist, 76(2), 566-583.
ICA. (1999). General International Standard Archival Description.
ICA. (2004). International Standard Archival Authority Records—Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families.
ICA. International Standard for Describing Function.
ICA EGAD. Record In Contexts: A Conceptual Model For Archival Description.
Klareld, A.. (2017). Rethinking Archives as Digital: The Consequences of “Paper Minds” in Illustrations and Definitions of E-archives. Archivaria, 83, 81-108.
McKemmish, S.. (1999). Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: The Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema. Archivaria, 48, 3-37.
McKemmish, S.. (2013). Toward the Archival Multiverse : Challenging the Binary Opposition of the Personal and Corporate Archive in Modern Archival Theory and Practice. Archivaria, 76, 111-114.
Niu, J.. (2016). Linked Data for Archives. Archivaria, 82, 83-110.
Reed, B.. New conceptual model for recordkeeping description.
(2017). Recordkeeping Innovation. http://www.records.com.au/new-conceptual-model-for-recordkeeping-description-records-in-contexts/.
TNA. (2017). The National Archives’ Digital Strategy 2017-2019. https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/the-national-archives-digital-strategy-2017-19.pdf.
TNA. Digital Cataloguing Practice.
TNA. (2017). Digital Inspire. 2015-2017.
TNA. Cataloguing paper records: guidance for government departments.
TNA Blog. (2016). Making connections: tracing people through our collection. http://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/blog/making-connections-tracing-people-collection/.
TNA Discovery. (2017). Discovery Web sites. http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/.
Trace, C. B.. (2011). Beyond the Magic to the Mechanism: Computers, Materiality, and What It Means for Records to Be “Born Digital.”. Archivaria, 72, 5-27.
Upward, F.. (2011). Archivists and changing social and information spaces: A continuum approach to recordkeeping and archiving in online cultures. Archivaria, 72, 197-237.
Yeo, G.. (2012). The Conceptual Fonds and the Physical Collection. Archivaria, 73, 43-80.
Yeo, G.. (2012). Bringing Things Together: Aggregate Records in a Digital Age. Archivaria, 74, 43-91.
- Downloaded
- Viewed
- 0KCI Citations
- 0WOS Citations