바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

논문 상세

이전 다음
논문 투고

Vol.17 No.1
Citation Share

ISAD(G)에서 RiC-CM으로의 전환에 관한 연구

Transition of Archival Description from ISAD(G) to Record in Context Conceptual Model

한국기록관리학회지 / Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-7247
2017, v.17 no.1, pp.93-115
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.093
박지영 (한성대학교)
박지영. (2017). ISAD(G)에서 RiC-CM으로의 전환에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 17(1), 93-115, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.1.093
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수
PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구에서는 ICA EGAD의 RiC-CM 초안을 분석하고 ISAD(G)의 기술요소와 맵핑하였으며, RiC-CM 기반의 기록물군 기술정보를 시범적으로 구축해 보았다. 이는 기록물 기술표준의 변화 경향을 파악하고, 기존의 기술표준과 연계할 때의 고려사항을 도출하기 위한 것이었다. RiC-CM과 ISAD(G)의 맵핑 유형에는 속성 간 맵핑, 속성-개체 맵핑, 속성-관계 맵핑이 있었다. 그리고 기술요소간 맵핑 외에 RiC-CM의 개체와 속성, 관계를 통해 기록레코드를 구축할 수 있는 프레임을 프로테제를 이용하여 구축하고, 예시 데이터를 시범적으로 입력하였다. 그 결과 기존의 기술 정보를 RiC-CM을 통해서도 대부분 표현할 수 있었다. 게다가 RiC-CM에서는 기록 기술 정보가 상세히 구분되어 있고, 개별 개체 간의 관계를 브라우징할 수 있는 특징이 강화되었음을 알 수 있었다.

keywords
기록물 기술, 기록 레코드, 기록 온톨로지, Records in Context, RiC-CM, archival description, archival rerecords, archival ontology, Record in Context, RiC-CM

Abstract

In this study, the RiC-CM (Records in Context-Conceptual Model) draft of the International Council on Archives Expert Group on Archival Description (ICA EGAD) was analyzed, mapped with the descriptive elements of ISAD(G), and the archival description of the record group based on RiC-CM was piloted. This was done to identify trends in the archival descriptive standards and to derive considerations in relation to improving existing descriptive standards. The mapping types of RiC-CM and ISAD(G) include inter-attribute mapping, attribute-entity mapping, and attribute-relation mapping. In addition to the mapping between descriptive elements, a frame for the archival information that can construct a record through the objects, attributes, and relationships of RiC-CM is constructed using the protege, and the example data is inputted for trial. As a result, it was possible to express most of the existing descriptive information of ISAD(G) through RiC-CM. In addition, in RiC-CM, the recording descriptive information is classified in detail, and the characteristic of browsing the relation between individual objects is enhanced.

keywords
기록물 기술, 기록 레코드, 기록 온톨로지, Records in Context, RiC-CM, archival description, archival rerecords, archival ontology, Record in Context, RiC-CM

참고문헌

1.

국가기록원. 영구기록물 기술지침.

2.

박지영. (2016). 차세대 기록물 기술표준에 관한 연구 - ICA EGAD의 Record In Context를 중심으로 -. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(1), 223-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.223.

3.

Bekiari, Chryssoula. (2015). FRBR object-oriented definition and mapping from FRBRER, FRAD and FRSAD(version 2. 3):International Working Group on FRBR and CIDOC CRM Harmonisation.

4.

Clavaud, Florence. (2016). Records in Contexts-Ontology(RiC-O). (-). ICA Congress.

5.

Clavaud, Florence. (2015). ICA Expert Group on Archival Description: Interim Report on the Development of a Conceptual Model (-). SAA Annual Meeting.

6.

Duranti, Luciana. (2016). Comments on “Records in Context.”:InterPARES Trust.

7.

Gueguen, Gretchen. (2013). Toward an International Conceptual Model for Archival Description:A Preliminary Report from the International Council on Archives’ Experts Group on Archival Description. The American Archivist, 76(2), 566-583.

8.

Hooland, Seth van. (2014). Linked Data for Libraries, Archives, and Museums:ALA.

9.

ICA. General International Standard Archival Description.

10.

ICA. (2004). International Standard Archival Authority Records—Corporate Bodies, Persons, and Families.

11.

ICA. International Standard Description of Functions.

12.

ICA. International Standard Description of Institutions with Archival Holdings.

13.

ICA. (2015). The Expert Group on Archival Description Web sites. http://www.ica.org/13851/egad-resources/egad-resources.html.

14.

ICA EGAD. Record In Contexts: A Conceptual Model For Archival Description.

15.

IFLA Study Group on the FRBR. (2008). Functional Requirements For Bibliographic Records. Final Report. (amended and corrected through February 2009). IFLA.

16.

ISO. ISO 23081-1:2006 Information and documentation - Records management processes - Metadata for records - Part 1: Principles.

17.

McCarthy, Gavan. (2014). Expert Group on Archival Description (EGAD) (Presentation in DCMI Pre-Conference Special Session). http://dcevents.dublincore.org/IntConf/index/pages/view/2014-archives.

18.

McCarthy, Gavan. (2016). Conceptual Models as Informatic Models: Records in Contexts as a Network (Developing Standards for Managing Records over Time, ISO TC46/SC11 and ICA Experts Group on Archival Description) (-). ICA Congress.

19.

Pitti, Daniel. (2016). Introduction: Background, Context, Pivotal Changes (-). ICA Congress.

20.

Popovici, Bogdan-Florin. (2016). A Broader Perspective Over Records As Seen By ‘Ric’ (-). ICA Congress.

21.

Stockting, Bill. (2016). Records in Contexts-Conceptual Model(RiC-CM) (-). ICA Congress.

한국기록관리학회지

논문 투고 OA 정책