바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1598-1487
  • E-ISSN2671-1487

기억을 위한 아키비스트 - 기록과 기억의 이론적 고찰 -

Archivists for Memory: A Theoretical Study on Archives and Memory

한국기록관리학회지, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-1487
2016, v.16 no.1, pp.41-59
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.041
신동희 (State University of New York at Albany)
김유승 (중앙대학교)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

기록학에서 집단 기억, 사회적 기억에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있으나, 아직 그 이론적 배경을 고찰한 연구는 많지 않다. 기억이 가지는 포괄성이 기록이 가지는 제한된 역사기술을 보완할 수 있다는 점에서 서구의 많은 학자들은 아키비스트가 문자화된 기록뿐만 아니라 도처에 만연해 있는 기억을 수집해야 한다고 주장한다. 아키비스트의 사회적 역할에는 공유되고 전승되는 기억을 통해 한 시대를 살고 있는 사람들의 모습을 재구성해야 함이 포함된다. 기억이 가지는 사회적 특성은 주류문화 위주 기록문화의 한계성에 도전하고, 비주류문화, 비기록문화의 역사를 포함하고 전승하도록 한다. 이러한 기억의 담론에서 아키비스트는 기록관에 수집하고 보존할 역사의 내용이 문자화된 지배집단의 기록에만 한정할지, 소외받고 배제되는 사회집단을 포함할 것인지 결정하는 역사의 중요한 권력자다. 본 연구에서는 기억에 대한 이론적 배경을 고찰하고, 역사와 기록이 기억의 담론에서 어떻게 인식되고 설명되는지 살펴본다. 결론에 갈음하여, 기억의 담론에서 기록관과 아키비스트의 역할을 논의한다.

Abstract

In archival discourse, social memory has been discussed for some time. Despite this, however, theoretical studies have not been prolific at all in the Korean archival community. Many Western scholars have argued that archivists should consider memory rather than records for archival preservation because the inclusiveness of the former will fill the gaps in the latter. Social memory that is shared and transmitted across generations in society would include the stories of marginalized groups of people who are often neglected in official documents. Archivists can reconstruct the diverse narratives of a variety of social groups based on social memory, and this would be their social responsibility. In this sense, it is archivists who exercise power regarding how history will be written in the future because they determine what would be preserved in archives: mainstream culture with official records or a broader spectrum of diverse stories of people in society. From this perspective, this paper intends to understand how memory is discussed in archival discourse and to review how archives and history are associated with memory in theories and practices.

참고문헌

1

김명훈. (2014). 기억과 기록 - 사회적 기억 구축을 위한 기록학의 역할. 기록학연구, (42), 3-35.

2

안정희. (2015). 기록이 상처를 위로한다:이야기나무.

3

윤은하. (2012). 공동체와 공동체 아카이브에 대한 고찰. 기록학연구, (33), 3-37.

4

최정은. (2011). 사회적 기억과 구술 기록화 그리고 아키비스트. 기록학연구, (30), 3-55.

5

Assmann, J.. (1995). Collective Memory and Cultural Identity. New German Critique, (65), 125-133.

6

Bartlett, F.. (1932). Remembering : A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology:Cambridge University Press.

7

Bastian, J. A.. (2009). Flowers for Homestead : A Case Study in Archives and Collective Memory. The American Archivist, 72, 113-132.

8

Blouin, Jr. F. X.. (1999). Archivists, Mediation, and Constructs of Social Memory. Archival Issues, 24(2), 101-112.

9

Brothman, B.. (2001). The Past that Archives Keep : Memory, History, and the Preservation of Archival Records. Archivaria, 51, 48-80.

10

Brown, A. D.. (2012). Memory’s Malleability : Its Role in Shaping Collective Memory and Social Identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 257-.

11

Brown, R. H.. (1998). The Making of Memory : The Politics of Archives, Libraries, and Museums in the Construction of National Consciousness. History of the Human Sciences, 11(4), 17-32.

12

Burke, P.. (1989). Memory: History, Culture and the Mind:Basil Blackwell Ltd.

13

Connerton, P.. (1989). How Societies Remember:Cambridge University Press.

14

Cook, T.. (2002). Archives, Records, and Power : From(Postmodern)Theory to(Archival)Performance. Archival Science, 2(3), 171-185.

15

Cox, R. J.. (1993). The Concept of Public Memory and its Impact on Archival Public Programming. Archivaria, 36, 122-135.

16

Craig, B. L.. (2002). Selected Themes in the Literature on Memory and Their Pertinence to Archives. The American Archivist, 65(Fall/Winter), 276-289.

17

Duff, W. M.. (2002). Stories and Names : Archival Description as Narrating Records and Constructing Meanings. Archival Science, 3, 263-285.

18

Foote, K.. (1990). To Remember and Forget : Archives, Memory, and Culture. The American Archivist, 53, 378-392.

19

Foote, K.. (1997). Shadowed Ground:University of Texas Press.

20

Geary, P. J.. (1994). Phantoms of Remembrance : Memory and Oblivion at the End of the First Millennium:Princeton University Press.

21

Halbwachs, M.. (1922). On Collective Memory. Edited, translated, and with an introduction by Lewis A. Coser:the University of Chicago Press.

22

Harris, V.. (2001). Seeing (in) Blindness: South Africa, Archives and Passion for Justice, opening keynote speech at the August 2001 Silver Jubilee annual conference of the Archives and Records Association of New Zealand. http://scnc.ukzn.ac.za/doc/LibArchMus/Arch/Harris_V_Freedom_of_Information_in_SA_Archives_for_justice.pdf.

23

Harris, V.. (2002). The Archival Silver : Power, Memory, and Archives in South Africa. Archival Science, 2(1/2), 63-86.

24

Hutton, P. H.. (1993). History as an Art of Memory:University of Vermont.

25

Klein, K. L.. (2000). On the Emergence of Memory in Historical Discourse. Representations, 69, 127-150.

26

Le Goff, J.. (1992). History and Memory. Translated by Steven Rendall and Elizabeth Clamon:Columbia University Press.

27

Light, M.. (2002). Colophons and Annotations : New Directions for the Finding Aid. The American Archivist, 65(2), 216-230.

28

Linenthal, E. T.. (2001). The unfinished bombing : Oklahoma City in American memory:Oxford University Press.

29

Loftus, E. F.. (1974). Reconstruction Of Automobile Destruction : An Example Of The Interaction Between Language And Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.

30

Lowenthal, D.. (1975). Past Time, Present Place : Landscape and Memory. The Geographical Review, 65, 1-36.

31

Lowenthal, D.. (1985). The Past is a Foreign Country:Cambridge University Press.

32

Meehan, J.. (2009). The Archival Nexus : Rethinking the Interplay of Archival Ideas about the Nature, Value, and Use of Records. Archival Science, 9, 157-164.

33

Millar, L.. (2010). Archives : Principles and practices:Neal-Schuman Publishers.

34

Nesmith, T.. (2002). Seeing Archives : Postmodernism and the Changing Intellectual Place of Archives. The American Archivist, 65, 24-41.

35

Nora, P.. (1989). Between Memory and History : Les Lieux de Memoire. Representations, 26, 7-24.

36

Schwartz, J. M.. (2002). Archives, Records and Power : The Making of Modern Memory. Archival Science, 2, 1-19.

37

신동희. (2010). Archival Description and Records from Historically Marginalized Cultures: A View from a Postmodern Window. 한국문헌정보학회지, 44(4), 115-130.

38

Steedman, C.. (2001). Something She Called a Fever : Michelet, Derrida, and Dust. The American Historical Review, 106(4), 1159-1180.

39

Taylor, H. A.. (1982). The Collective Memory: Archives and Libraries As Heritage. Archivaria, 15, 124-125.

40

Thelen, D.. (1989). Memory and American History. Journal of American History, 75, 1117-1129.

41

race, C.. (2002). What Is Recorded Is Never Simply ‘What Happened’: Recordkeeping in Modern Organizational Culture. Archival Science, 2(1/2), 137-159.

42

Wallot, J.. (1991). Building a Living Memory For the History of Our Present : New Perspectives on Archival Appraisal. Journal of Canadian Historical Association, 2(1), 263-282.

43

Wallot, J.. (1996). Limited Identities for a Common Identity : Archivists in the Twenty-First Century. Archivaria, 41, 6-30.

44

Wareham, E.. (2002). From Explorers to Evangelists : Archivists, Recordkeeping, and Remembering in the Pacific Islands. Archival Science, 2, 187-207.

45

Woolfe, D.. (1991). Memory and Historical Culture in Early Modern England. Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 2, 283-308.

46

Yeo, G.. (2007). Concepts of Record(1) : Evidence, Information, and Persistent Tepresentations. The American Archivist, 70(2), 315-343.

47

Young, J. E.. (1993). The Texture of Memory : Holocaust Memorials and Meaning:Yale University Press.

48

Young, M. B.. (2002). Crimes of War: Guilt and Denial in the Twentieth Century:The New Press.

한국기록관리학회지