바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

  • P-ISSN1598-1487
  • E-ISSN2671-1487

기록 생애주기 관점에서 본 기록관리 메타데이터 표준의 특징 분석

Feature Analysis of Metadata Schemas for Records Management and Archives from the Viewpoint of Records Lifecycle

한국기록관리학회지, (P)1598-1487; (E)2671-1487
2010, v.10 no.2, pp.75-99
https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2010.10.2.075
백재은 (University of Tsukuba)
Shigeo Sugimoto (University of Tsukuba)

  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

Abstract

Digital resources are widely used in our modern society. However, we are facing fundamental problems to maintain and preserve digital resources over time. Several standard methods for preserving digital resources have been developed and are in use. It is widely recognized that metadata is one of the most important components for digital archiving and preservation. There are many metadata standards for archiving and preservation of digital resources, where each standard has its own feature in accordance with its primary application. This means that each schema has to be appropriately selected and tailored in accordance with a particular application. And, in some cases, those schemas are combined in a larger frame work and container metadata such as the DCMI application framework and METS. There are many metadata standards for archives of digital resources. We used the following metadata standards in this study for the feature analysis me metadata standards - AGLS Metadata which is defined to improve search of both digital resources and non-digital resources, ISAD(G) which is a commonly used standard for archives, EAD which is well used for digital archives, OAIS which defines a metadata framework for preserving digital objects, and PREMIS which is designed primarily for preservation of digital resources. In addition, we extracted attributes from the decision tree defined for digital preservation process by Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC) and compared the set of attributes with these metadata standards. This paper shows the features of these metadata standards obtained through the feature analysis based on the records lifecycle model. The features are shown in a single frame work which makes it easy to relate the tasks in the lifecycle to metadata elements of these standards. As a result of the detailed analysis of the metadata elements, we clarified the features of the standards from the viewpoint of relationships between the elements and the lifecycle stages. Mapping between metadata schemas is often required in the long-term preservation process because different schemes are used in the records lifecycle. Therefore, it is crucial to build a unified framework to enhance interoperability of these schemes. This study presents a basis for the interoperability of different metadata schemas used in digital archiving and preservation.

참고문헌

1

後籐敏行. (2007). デジタル情報保存のためのメタデータ : 現状と課題. 情報管理, 50(2), 74-.

2

栗山正光. ディジタル情報保存のためのメタデータ(1). http://www.tulips.tsukuba.ac.jp/memb/mtkuri/reports/metadata1.html.

3

難波忠清外. 核融合アーカイブズデータベースの共有化. http://www.nifs.ac.jp/archives/01aA31P.pdf#search=‘eadの特徴'.

4

日本図書館協会, 栗山正光訳. PREMIS保存メタデータのためのデータ辞書第2.0版. http://www.jla.or.jp/publish/PREMIS.pdf.

5

白才恩. (2007). ディジタルリソースの保存方式選択のためのガイドライン. in: 情報処理 学会研究報告: 情報学基礎研究会報告.

6

Chan, Lois Mai. (2006). Metadata Interoperability and Standardization: A Study of Methodology Part 1. D-Lib Magazine, 12(6), -.

7

Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System(OAIS). http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf.

8

Day, Michael. (2001). Metadata for Digital Preservation: A Review of Recent Developments (161-172). ECDL 2001, LNCS.

10

Digital Preservation Coalition. Decision Tree for Selection of Digital Materials for Longterm Retention. http://www.dpconline.org/advice/preservationhandbook/decision-tree.

11

Dürr, E. H.. (2006). Archival Metadata for Durable Data Sets. The Netherlands (-). DIR’06 Dutch-Belgian Information Retrieval Workshop.

12

Evans, Joanne. (2005). Create Once, Use Many Times: The Clever Use of Recordkeeping Metadata for Multiple Archival Purposes. Archival Science, (5), 17-42.

13

Government of South Australia. Records Life Cycle. http://www.decs.sa.gov.au/rmp/pages/cg0000941/lifecycle/?reFlag=1.

14

Hakala, Juha. Metadata for Referencing and Archival Usage. http://eos.wdcb.ru/eps2/eps02009/eps02009.pdf.

15

Harvard University Library. Metadata Standards. http://hul.harvard.edu/ois/digproj/metadata-standards.html.

16

Haslhofer, Bernhard. (2010). A Survey of Techniques for Achieving Metadata Interoperability. ACM Computing Surveys, 42(2), 1-37.

17

International Council on Archives. ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description, Second edition. http://www.ica.org/sites/default/files/isad_g_2e.pdf.

18

McKemmish, Sue, Glenda Acland, Nigel Ward, and Barbara Reed. Describing Records in Context in the Continuum: the Australian Recordkeeping Metadata Schema. http://infotech.monash.edu/research/groups/rcrg/publications/archiv01.html.

19

National Archives of Australia. Australian Government Implementation Manual : AGLS Metadata. http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/AGLS_Manual_v2_tcm2-914.pdf.

20

National Archives of Australia. Australian Government Recordkeeping Metadata Standard Version 2.0. http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/AGRkMS_Final%20Edit_16%2007%2008_Revised_tcm2-12630.pdf.

21

Online Computer Library Center. Data Dictionary for Preservation Metadata: Final Report of the PREMIS Working Group. http://www.loc.gov/standards/premis/v2/premis-2-0.pdf.

22

The Library of Congress. Encoded Archival Description(EAD). http://www.loc.gov/ead.

23

The National Archives and Records Administration. Records have Lifecycle. http://www.archives.gov/about/info/whats-a-record.html.

한국기록관리학회지