바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

검색어: archiving centers, 검색결과: 4
1
고은지(명지대학교) ; 이해영(명지대학교) 2022, Vol.22, No.4, pp.151-174 https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.4.151
초록보기
초록

기록 기술은 기록의 검색과 이용에 필수적인 도구로써 기록의 활용에 있어 핵심적이다. 콘텐츠 서비스는 기록의 활용과 콘텐츠의 중요성이 강조되는 현대 사회에서 핵심적인 서비스다. 이 연구에서는 기록 기술과 콘텐츠 서비스를 다른 영역으로 볼 것이 아니라 상호보완적으로 발전할 수 있는 관계로 보았다. 기록 기술이 풍부하게 갖추어져 있으면 이를 기반으로 양질의 콘텐츠를 제작할 수 있고, 이렇게 만든 콘텐츠를 다시 기록 기술과 연계하여 기록 기술을 더욱 풍부하게 만들 수 있다. 이 연구에서는 기록 기술과 콘텐츠 서비스의 상호보완적 관계 밝히고, 이를 기반으로 한 고도화 방안을 제안하고자 한다. 이를 위해 국가기록원과 대통령기록관 웹사이트의 기록 기술 및 콘텐츠 서비스 현황과 문제점을 분석했고, 이와 비교할 모범사례로 영국의 TNA와 미국의 NARA, 서울기록원과 민주화운동기념사업회 오픈아카이브를 선정하였다. 6개의 기관을 분석한 시사점을 바탕으로 기록 기술과 콘텐츠 서비스 각각의 고도화방안과 상호보완적 발전방안을 함께 제안하였다. 이 연구를 통해 기록 기술과 콘텐츠 서비스가 상호보완적 방향으로 발전하길 기대해본다.

Abstract

Archival descriptions are significant in utilizing archives, as they are important tools for archival research and use. Meanwhile, content services are key services in modern society, where the use of archives and the importance of content are increasing. In this study, archival descriptions and content services were not viewed as different areas but as a relationship that could advance complementarily. This is because if archival descriptions are rich and well-prepared, high-quality content can be produced based on them, and archival descriptions can be enriched if well-made content is supplemented or linked to the descriptions again. This study intends to reveal the complementary relationship between archival descriptions and content services and propose an advancement plan based on this relationship. As such, the current status and problems of the archival descriptions and content services of the National Archives of Korea and the Presidential Archives website were analyzed, and the UK's National Archives (TNA), the USA's National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the Seoul Metropolitan Archives, and the Korea Democracy Foundation's Open Archives were selected as exemplary cases for comparison. Based on the implications of the six analyzed institutions, an advancement plan for archival descriptions and content services, as well as a complementary development plan, was proposed. Through this study, it is expected that archival descriptions and content services will develop in a mutually complementary direction.

2
강성봉(한성대학교 역사문화콘텐츠트랙) 2022, Vol.22, No.1, pp.237-243 https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.1.237
초록보기
초록

Abstract

Seongbuk Village Archive is a village archive built by Seongbuk-gu Office and Seongbuk Cultural Center to contain the uniqueness and specificity of the region. It is a community archive that preserves the records of the community and a digital archive that builds a database through the digitalization of source data. The management system and home page were established through annual and step-by-step promotion through public-private governance. Seongbuk Village Archive’s system is designed to facilitate data accumulation and connection between individual records based on the advanced village record standard classification system. Based on this, Seongbuk Cultural Center tried to produce convergence cultural content by linking records online and off-line. In addition, the composition of items displayed on the website has been diversified to not only preserve records but also produce and utilize content. It is a structure created after contemplating how to show the creation and existence of Seongbuk’s historical and cultural resources to users in context. In addition, a richer archive platform was built through various curations and activities of the resident record group.

3
서화열(몽양기념관) ; 임진희(명지대학교) 2022, Vol.22, No.3, pp.55-81 https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.3.055
초록보기
초록

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore a budget-securing strategy to enable archival professionals in public institutions to continuously secure the budget for records management projects. This study is an analysis of the results of in-depth interviews with 14 archival professionals who have worked for public institutions and secured budgets for records management projects. As a result of the analysis, 4 upper categories and 10 categories are extracted as factors influencing budget securement. The top four categories are the job environment of archival professionals, umbrella organization and organizational culture, business and budget characteristics, and system and social environment. As the budget-securing strategy for archival professionals, a total of 3 categories and 13 strategic codes are derived. The three categories are utilizing individual-centered competencies, establishing organization-centered relationships, and finding external environment–centered triggers. This study emphasized the perspective of archival professionals and suggested implications such as the role of archival professionals and the direction of improvement in securing budgets.

4
김소연(동의대학교) ; 이은주(동의대학교) 2022, Vol.22, No.4, pp.87-107 https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.4.087
초록보기
초록

본 연구의 목적은 기록정보서비스의 의미와 범주에 대해 고찰하고, 이를 기반으로 기록정보서비스의 연구 성과를 분석함에 있다. 이를 위해 기록정보서비스의 정의, 유형, 대상을 검토하여 기록정보서비스의 연구 범위를 설정하고, 이에 따라 183편의 국내 학술논문을 수집하여 내용분석을 시도하였다. 내용분석은 2단계로 나누어 실시하였는데, 양적 지표를 기준으로 한 전반적인 연구추이 분석과 더불어 노드엑셀을 활용하여 확대된 내용분석인 언어 네트워크 분석을 시도하였다. 이러한 분석 결과를 토대로, 본 연구에서는 기존의 기록정보서비스 연구가 2006년 이후 본격적으로 시작되었으며 점차 이용자 중심의 기록정보서비스 패러다임이 적용되고 있음을 밝혀내었다. 그러나 논의의 대상과 연구방법, 게재 학회지 등이 편중되어 있는 한계 또한 확인하였고, 향후 논의의 지평을 확대할 필요가 있음을 제안하였다.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the meaning and category of archival information services and analyze its research results. To this end, the research scope of the archival information service was set by reviewing the definition, types, and subjects. A total of 183 journal articles were gathered, and content analysis was conducted in two stages. In addition to the overall research trend analysis based on quantitative indicators, an expanded content analysis and language network analysis were attempted using Node Excel. This study revealed that the archival information service research began in earnest after 2006 and that the user-centered paradigm is gradually being applied. However, limitations confirmed that the subject of discussion, research methods, and journals were biased, and expanding the horizon of future discussion was suggested.

한국기록관리학회지