초록

세계 각국의 아키비스트 협회 및 전문가 단체에서는 전문직적 기준과 아키비스트 윤리규정을 발표하고, 그 윤리규정을 통하여 실천적 과정에서 부딪히는 여러 가지 윤리적 문제들에 대해 윤리적 지침을 제공하고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 외국의 아키비스트 협회에서 채택한 윤리규정을 비교하여 아키비스트 윤리규정의 제정에 필요한 필수요소를 추출하고 아키비스트 윤리규정 모델을 제시하는 것이다. 이를 위해 SAA(미국), SA(영국), ACA(캐나다), ASA(호주), ICA(국제기구) 5개 아키비스트 협회를 선정하였다. 아키비스트 윤리규정을 크게 기록정보관리, 기록정보서비스, 전문직 실천과 조직에 관한 내용으로 나누어 분석하였고, 필수요소를 제안하였다. 아울러 필수요소를 중심으로 전자기록환경에서 고려하여야 할 점도 함께 고찰하였다.

Abstract

Associations of archivists and professional communities all over the world have released criteria and code of ethics which provide solutions of ethical problems in practical uses to make their professional positions to be kept. This study aims to analyze some of existing codes of ethics established by association of archivists and suggest model of ethic codes for archivists with essential aspects. Selected associations of archivists are SAA(Society of American Archivists), SA(Society of Archivists), ACA(Association of Canadian Archivists), ASA(Australian Society of Archivists), ICA(International Council on Archives). Five codes of ethics were selected for analysis and comparison from these associations and compared with ethics for achival management, archival information service and professional activities. This study consider essential aspects in the electronic records environment.

초록

Abstract

This study aims for the above mentioned. After all, through the analysis of Electronic Question/Answering Function to understand a user’s demand under online circumstances, groping for the method to provide an appropriate Archival Information Service is the most important thing. For this, in this study, it researched the users interviews and the research related to users as a precedence study, and the studies having examined the state of demanding information by users through analyzing the e-mail actually. Additionally, by looking over the study of Library and Information Science that is activated in a field of Electronic Question/Answering Function rather than Archival Science, as a matter of fact, the study has come up with the standard for analyzing Electronic Question/Answering Function. And based on the precedence study, the instances for the National Archives from USA, England, Australia and Canada were analyzed, and the chance of activating Archival Information Service were tried to grope for in the study. This study might be one of methodologies in examining the users study that is not activated yet in Archival Science. Therefore, the users study can be carried out in various methods as well as Electronic Archives/Answering Service. This study might be the important information in providing far better Archival Information Services. It is desirable that based on this opportunity, the study related to the various users by examining not only Electronic Archives/Answering Function but also Question/Answering of the users and the Archivists in the filed to the larger extend will be activated for Archival Science.

초록

본 연구에서는 1980년대부터 2000년대에 이르기까지 기록관리학 연구영역에 대하여 수행된 총 12건의 연구들을 시계열적으로 분석하였다. 분석결과, 1980년대의 기록관리학 연구들은 주로 기록물과 기록관을 중심으로 수행되었으며, 1990년대에는 전자기록물의 급증과 함께 그 연구영역이 정보시스템 및 사회 환경으로 확장된 것으로 나타났다. 2000년대에는 디지털 환경에서 파생되는 여러 전문적 정보기술 주제와 함께 인접 학문과의 결합성이 더욱 강조되는 학제적 연구주제들이 제기되고 있으므로 향후 기록관리학 연구영역의 확장 가능성을 확인할 수 있었다.

Abstract

In this study, twelve research papers on “records management and archives research areas" that were written from the 1980s to the 2000s were analyzed according to a timeline. The results show that the main subject areas during the 1980's were records and archives. During the 1990s, with the increase of electronic records, research areas expanded to information systems and related social environments. In the 2000s, more advanced technical and interdisciplinary subjects have emerged in the digital society. These results show that research areas in records management and archives still have much potential for growth and will expand in the near future.